INDEX INTELLIGENCE: SPX—Market Earnings Outlook
MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
- AU Editorial: Elliott and Its Ways
- Weekly Outlook: March 15, 2010
- Midday Action: March 15
- Index Trading: Let's Trade the Dow! Part 3
- Closing Wrap-Up, March 16
- Kaeppel's Corner: Catching Up on a Few Ideas
- Kaeppel's Corner: Forecasting the Stock Market in 5 Minutes a Month
- Closing Wrap-Up, March 15
- Growth Stock Swing Option: March 15, 2010
- Options Corner: The Magic of Butterflies, Part 14
- Kaeppel's Corner: Forecasting the Stock Market in 5 Minutes a Month
- Kaeppel's Corner: And Up Through the Ground Came a Bubblin Crude...
- Real-World Trading: The Debit Spread, Part IV
- Real-World Trading: The Debit Spread, Part III
- AU Editorial: Elliott and Its Ways
- Options Corner: The Magic of Butterflies, Part 14
- TRADING FLOOR SECRETS: The Butterfly vs. the Broken Wing Butterfly
- Real-World Trading: Mergers and the Butterfly Strategy
- Real-World Trading: Comparing the Buy-Write and Calendar Spread, Part I
- Real-World Trading: Comparing the Buy-Write and Calendar Spread, Part II
- Midday Action: March 17
- Kaeppel's Corner: Catching Up on a Few Ideas
- Real-World Trading: The Debit Spread, Part IV
- Midday Action: March 16
- Growth Stock Swing Option: March 15, 2010
- Options Corner: The Magic of Butterflies, Part 14
- Swing Trading: The Search for Harmony
- Commodities Roundup: Wheat
- Economic Watchdog, March 15
- Midday Action: March 15
SPONSORED LINKS
October 10, 2001
The stock market has recovered most of the losses incurred in the week following the terrorist attacks of September 11. In fact, one of the broadest measures of stock prices—the S&P 500 Index ($SPX)—is less than 2% from its pre-attack levels. A number of sectors have been performing relatively well and investors appear to be looking beyond the short-term impact of the business disruptions and financial losses caused by the terrorist assault, and at the prospect of a profit recovery going forward. However, while a few sectors of the market appear to be stabilizing, the earnings picture remains clouded and there may be a few more bumps in the road before the profit recession has definitely reached an end.
One of the key factors driving stock prices lower for the past twelve months has been the ongoing profit woe within corporate America. As is often the case, stocks turned lower before the actual earnings numbers turned negative. The S&P 500, which measures the average share price of five hundred of the largest US companies, hit a peak during the third quarter 2000. In that quarter, earnings for the S&P 500 were strong (18.3% higher than the year before). In other words, the S&P 500 companies were showing an earnings growth rate in excess of 18% when the market topped out. The S&P 500 earnings growth rate remained positive until the first quarter 2001. By that time, SPX was already 24% below its September 2000 highs.
Now, more than a year after the S&P 500 Index hit a peak, third quarter 2001 earnings reporting season is at hand. In contrast to last year, rather than showing profit growth, according to the earnings-tracking firm First Call, earnings are expected to decline 21.3%. In addition, profit growth has been negative during every earnings reporting period this year and are expected show declines again in the fourth quarter.
Yet, as investors prepare for another grim earnings reporting season, the S&P 500 has been performing well. So far this month, SPX is up nearly 4%. The strength might be a sign that much of the bad news has been priced into the market. After all, the forecasts and predictions regarding third quarter earnings have been negative for some time. In other words, investors already knew that profit reports were going to be a disaster and sold shares before the actual earnings season was underway. Now that the actual results are being posted, perhaps stock prices already reflect the bad news. It’s similar to the concept of, “buy the rumor, sell the news.” As an example, shares of Motorola (MOT) were unchanged on Wednesday despite news that it posted a $154 million loss in the quarter and the chipmaker will cut 7,000 jobs. Indeed, much of the bad news appears to have been priced into the stock.
If the bad news has been discounted, going forward, the third quarter numbers are not likely to offer much guidance because investors have already priced in the worst-case scenario. The more important information will be concerning the outlook going forward and the analyst reactions to what companies are saying about the fourth quarter of this year and the first quarter of next. If analysts continue to hear earnings warnings regarding the next two quarters, earnings estimates will be forced down and stock prices are likely to remain volatile.
On that note, there appears reason to believe that estimates for the fourth quarter and next year’s first quarter will continue to come down. According to First Call,
“Following the 911 attack, we had reduced our 4Q01 (fourth quarter 2001) expectations from a decline of 10% or maybe 15% to a decline of 15% to 20%. Given how fast 4Q01 estimates are coming down, it now seems likely that the decline will be closer to 20%, with a good chance of being worse than a 20% decline.” In addition, estimates for the first quarter of next year are also coming down. On September 10, first quarter 2002 S&P 500 earnings were expected to show 8.2% growth, now they are estimated to be unchanged from a very weak first quarter 2001. In other words, show zero profit growth. In addition, chances are, earnings in the first quarter of 2002 will show actual declines. If so, the five consecutive quarters of earnings declines, will mark the worst period for corporate profits in more than thirty years. It would equal the five down quarters during the 1969-70 recession.
Therefore, while stock prices may rise when earnings results are reported over the next few weeks, the more important information concerns the next two quarters. Investors are facing one of the worst profit recessions in history and there is a possibility that more bearish earnings news lie ahead. If so, the result is likely to be more market turbulence and opportunities to make profits using non-directional option strategies that benefit from rising volatility, such as straddles.
S&P 500 Index ($SPX) | |
Statistics |
|
Implied Volatility | 32% |
Historical Volatility: 50-day | 24% |
30-day | 28% |
20-day | 32% |
Put-Call Ratio (10/10/01) | .77 |
30-day Median Put Call | 1.89 |
52-Week High | 1,552.85 |
52-Week Low | 944.75 |
Price (10/10/2001) | 1,068.55 |
YTD Return | -19.1% |
Average P/E Ratio | 28.29 |
No. of Profitable Companies | NA |
Number of Components | 500 |
Type of Index | Market Value Weighted |
Exercise Style | European |
Over the past few weeks, Index Intelligence covered the following indices:
Date | Index | Ticker |
08/13/01 | S&P 500 | |
08/16/01 | Dow Jones Industrial Average | |
08/17/01 | PHLX Semiconductor Index | |
08/20/01 | European-Style S&P 100 | |
08/22/01 | AMEX Natural Gas Index | |
08/23/01 | Nasdaq 100 Index Trust | |
08/24/01 | AMEX Pharmaceutical Index | |
08/27/01 | PHLX Oil Service Index | |
08/28/01 | S&P Retail Store Index | |
08/29/01 | DJ Transportation Average | |
08/30/01 | PHLX Box-Maker Index | |
08/31/01 | Street.com Internet Index | |
09/04/01 | PHLX Utility Index | |
09/6/01 | Value and Growth | |
09/10/01 | S&P Chemical Index | |
09/17/01 | AMEX Airline Index | |
09/18/01 | Internet HOLDRS | |
09/19/01 | AMEX Broker/Dealer Index | |
09/20/01 | AMEX Japan Index | |
09/21/01 | S&P 100 | |
09/24/01 | AMEX Oil Index | |
09/26/01 | AMEX Disk Drive Index | |
09/27/01 | PHLX Gold and Silver Mining Index | |
10/01/01 | Mini-Nasdaq 100 | |
10/02/01 | MS Cyclical Index | |
10/03/01 | Oil Service Holders | |
10/04/01 | Russell Small Cap Index | |
10/09/01 | PHLX Bank Index |
Frederic Ruffy
Senior Writer & Index Strategist
Optionetics.com ~ Your Options Education Site
Visit Fred Ruffy’s Forum
© Copyright 1995-2010 Optionetics. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only. Republication and re-dissemination, including posting to newsgroups, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Optionetics. Optionetics is a registered trademark of Optionetics, Inc.

